Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 02:47

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What is a movie franchise you actually think deserves a reboot?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sloths The Size of Elephants Roamed America, Before Abruptly Vanishing - ScienceAlert
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Recovering from surgery isn’t easy. Exercising in the water can help. - The Washington Post
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.